← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/856/2014dismissed

Israr Ahmad v. Abbas And ORS.

2019-04-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr.M.P. No. 856 of 2014 Israr Ahmad, S/o late Hazi Sheikh Badal, aged about 60 years, R/o village Kamhariya, Police Station Mohda, Civil and Revenue District Hamirpur (Uttar Pradesh) ----Petitioner

Versus

1.

Abbas, S/o Peer Mohammad, aged about 42 years, 2.

Bholu @ Munsad, S/o Amanat Ali, aged about 40 years, 3.

Munna @ Abdul Salim, S/o Abudl Gafur, aged about 40 years, 4.

Kariya @ Abdul Akram, S/o Abdul Gafut, aged about 35 years, 5.

Raju @ Rajuudin, S/o Tajuuddin, aged about 32 years, All R/o village Kamhariya, Police Station Mohda, Civil and Revenue District Hamirpur (Uttar Pradesh) 6.

The State of Chhatisgarh, Through : the Crime Investigation Department, Police Headquarter, Raipur (C.G.) 7.

The State of Chhattisgarh, Through : the Officer In-charge, Police Station - Tumgaon, District Mahasamund (C.G.) & Cr.M.P. No. 410 of 2015 1.

Abbas, aged about 42 years, son of Shri Peer Mohammad 2.

Bholu @ Munsaad, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Amanat Ali 3.

Munna @ Abdul Saleem, aged about 40 years, son of Shri Abdul Rauf 4.

Raju @ Rajuuddin, aged about 32 years, son of Shri Tajuddin 5.

Karla @ Abdul Akram, aged about 35 years, son of Shri Abdul Gaffur All are resident of Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (C.G.) ----Petitioners

Versus

State of Chhattisgarh, through the SHO, P.S. Tumgaon, District Mahasamund (C.G.)

---- Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Rashmi Sen, Advocate on behalf of Mrs. Hamida Siddiqui, Advocate.

For Respondents No. 1, 2 & 4 : Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondents No. 3 and 5 : Ms. Swati Upadhyaya, Advocate. For State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Panel Lawyer. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 29/04/2019 1.

According to office report, Criminal Case, from which these Cr.M.P. have arisen, has already been decided by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mahasamund on 27.12.2017, as the instant petitions filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. has become infructuous. 2.

Accordingly, the Cr.M.Ps. are dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-