High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3830/2018disposed off

Smt. Anjulata Jaiswal v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-08-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3830 of 2018 Smt. Anjulata Jaiswal W/o Hitesh Kumar Jaiswal Aged About 25 Years R/o Ward No. 4, Bilaigarh, District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through- The Secretary, Women And Child Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Baloda Bazar, District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Nagar Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District- Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project, Bilaigarh, District- Baloda Bazar Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Bina Kumari D/o Late Mangtu R/o Ward No. 4, Bilaigarh, DistrictBaloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : BalodabazarBhathapara, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri C Jayant K Rao, Advocate For State :

Shri RK Gupta, Dy. Advocate General.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 06/08/2018

1. The writ petition is disposed of with the consent of the parties at the motion stage itself.

2. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order of appointment of respondent No.5 as an Anganbadi Karyakarta for ward No.12 of Nagar Panchayat, Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh dated 10.05.2018.

3. At the outset, this Court is not inclined to entertain the petition for the simple reason that the order under challenge in the present writ petition

could be assailed by way of an appeal before the Collector under the scheme of employment itself.

4. Given the facts that the petitioner has an alternative efficacious remedy of appeal under the scheme itself, the present writ petition at this stage is held to be premature reserving the liberty of the petitioner to prefer an appeal within a period of two weeks from today. The appellate authority shall thereafter on receipt of the appeal shall consider and decide the same in accordance with rules ignoring the question of limitation, if any, and the appeal be decided as expeditiously as possible on merits preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of the appeal.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder