Chhattisgarh Rajya Vidyut Mandal Shikshak Karmachari Sangh Korba v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Page No.1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(S) No. 1859 of 2016

1. Chhattisgarh Rajya Vidyut Mandal Shikshak Karmachari Sangh Korba Through : Its Vice President K. D. Mahant, ( Lecturer ), S/O. Late Lachhi Das Mahant, Aged About 59 Years, R/O. N. D. 73 C.S.E.B. Colony Korba East, District Korba ( Chhattisgarh )

2. Jitendra Kumar Gole, S/O. Late H. S. Gole, Aged About 50 Years ( Asst. Teacher ), R/O. OC- 39, CSEB Colony Korba ( East ), District Korba ( Chhattisgarh ) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary Department Of School Education , Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur ( Chhattisgarh )

2. Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Through : Director Power Holding Company Limited, Through Director Chhattisgarh State Power Holding Company Limited, Dagania, Raipur (Chhattisgarh )

3. Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Through Its Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited, Dagania, Raipur ( Chhattisgarh )

4. Chief Engineer Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Korba ( East ), District Korba ( Chhattisgarh )

5. Executive Director, Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Limited Korba ( West), District Korba ( Chhattisgarh )

6. Vidyut Grih Vidyalaya Prabandhan Samiti, Through : Secretary Vidyut Grih Vidyalaya Prabandhan Samiti, Korba ( East ), District Korba ( Chhattisgarh )

Page No.2

7. Vidyut Nagar Shiksha Samiti Darri Korba ( West ) Through : Secretary Vidyut Nagar Shiksha Samiti Korba ( West ) District - Korba ( Chhattisgarh ) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. Anupam Dubey, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 01/08/2016 1.

Heard.

2.

With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the petition is heard finally.

3.

The prayer in this petition is to grant the petitioners arrears of Vth pay commission from 01.01.1996 to 30.09.2016 and as stated that already the Vth pay commission has been awarded but not the arrears. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that though the Vth pay commission has been implemented but the arrears has not been given. It is submitted that the petitioners have made several representations, but no action has been taken. It is further submitted that though the petitioner is entitled for arrears, but it has been withheld by the respondent authorities.

5.

Considering the issue, it is directed that, if the petitioners make a fresh representation before the respondent No.3 within further period of one month, the grievances of the petitioners will be decided within further period of three months by the respondent No.3.

Page No.3 6.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed off. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Balram