High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1587/2020disposed off

Smt. Rajni Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-08-21Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1587 of 2020 Smt. Rajni Thakur W/o Shri Surendra Singh Thakur Aged About 58 Years R/o Naya Ganj Near Samleshwari Mandir Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Division Officer (Revenue) Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

4. The Executive Engineer Public Works, Department Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For State :

Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. GA Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 21/08/2020

1. Grievance of the petitioner is that in the year 2005 land of the petitioner was acquired but till date neither compensation has been granted nor any rehabilitation advantage has been given to the petitioner. Limited prayer made by the petitioner that he may be allowed to make representation and representation may be decided and the entitlement of the claim of the petitioner which has been under the award may be given and in case award is not passed, land of the petitioner may be surveyed and if it has been acquired then proper acquisition proceeding may be drawn.

2. Considering the prayer of the petitioner, petitioner is allowed to make representation within a further period of three weeks, the authority thereafter shall decide the same. It is further clarified that if the land of the petitioner has been acquired and award has been passed then amount of the award may be paid to the petitioner within a period of four months and if it is found that the land of the petitioner has not been acquired as per the Act, then in such case if the petitioner has been deprived of the property then proper acquisition proceeding may be drawn forthwith.

3. With such observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit