← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhSA/53/2005dismissed

Moti Ram And Others v. Parmanand And Others

2019-01-28Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Second Appeal No. 53 of 2005 1-A. Motiram, son of Bhopal Singh, aged 57 years, 1-B Sitaram, son of Bhopal Singh, aged 47 years, 1-C Parwati Bai, son of Bhopal Singh (w/o Madhusudan Naik), aged 54 years, resident of Vilage Loharsingh, Tahsil. - District Raigarh (C.G.) 1-d Radhabai oYn Bhopal Singh (since deceased) 1-d(i) Surendra, Son of Meghnath, aged 23 years, 1-D(ii) Basanti, son of Meghnath, aged 21 years, Both resident of village - Pendarvan, Tah. Dabhra, District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ----Appellants/Defendants

Versus

1-A. Parmanand, son of Thansingh, aged 53 years, 1-B Indu Bai, wife of Thansingh, aged -79 years, 1-C Mankunwar, S/o Thansingh (since deceased), aged -58 years, 1-C.(i) Surendra, son of Hemlal Patel, aged 43 years, 1-C(ii) Bharti, S/o Hemlal Patel, aged 37 years, 1-C(iii) Purendra, son of Hemlal Patel, aged 37 years, All Resident of Village - Katnai, Tahsil & District Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 2.

Teekaram, son of Banmali, aged 79 years, resident of Village - Salhe, Tahsil.- Dabhra, District - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 3.

Hanuman Prasad, S/o Haricharan, aged 59 years, 4.

Sheshram, son of Nohar Prasad, aged 39 years, 5.

Pransingh, son of Nohar Prasad, aged 44 years, 6.

Vidhyaram, son of Heeradhar, aged 59 years, 7.

Peelaram, son of Heeradhar, aged 44 years, 8.

Chhedilal, son of Heeradhar, aged 59 years,

Respondents No. 3 to 8, resident of village - Khaira, Tah. Dabhra, District JanjgirChampa (C.G.) 9.

State of Chhattisgarh, through Collector, District - Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ---- Respondents/Plaintiffs.

For Appellants : None For Respondent No. 9/State : Ms. K. Tripti Rao, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 28/01/2019 1.

Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellants even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.

2.

Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-