Mahesh Kumar Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3615 of 2019

1. Mahesh Kumar Dewangan S/o Late Lakhan Lal Dewangan Aged About 67 Years Retired A.G.Iii, Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon, R/o Village Bhedikala, Post Bhedikala, Police Station Lalbag, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

2. Khemlal Dewangan S/o Shri Padumlal Dewangan Aged About 69 Years Retd. Revenue Sub Inspector, Thakurpara, Ward No. 3, Chikhali, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

3. Bisesardas Sahu S/o Late Bhanwar Singh Sahu Aged About 69 Years Retd. Assistant Revenue Inspector, R/o Village And Post Bhedikala, Police Station Lalbag, Tahsil And District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh

4. Rupesh Kumar S/o Late Mangalram Putu Aged About 36 Years (Legal Representative /son Of Deceased Mangalram Putu, Safai Kamgar (Peon) Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon, R/o Prabhatnagar, Lalbag, Ward No. 23, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex Mantralaya Naya Raipurm, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Directorate Urban Administration And Development, Through The Director, Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Capital Complex, Mantralaya Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon Through Its Commissioner Municipal Commissioner Municipal Corporation Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioner :

Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. GA For Respondent No. 3 :

Mr. Tarkeshwar Nande, on behalf of Mr.

Sourabh Sharma, Advocates Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/05/2019

1. The dispute raised by the petitioner in the present Writ Petition is of nongranting interest on G.P.F. at par that what has been paid to the Government Employees.

2. The counsel for the parties fairly submit that, the issue involved in the case stands squarely covered by the judgment passed by this Court in two of the Writ Petitions decided on 04/08/2017 i.e. in WPS No. 3458/2007 and WPS No. 4640/1999.

3. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the parties, the present Writ Petition also deserves to be and is accordingly allowed in terms of the order passed by this Court in the afore mentioned two Writ Petitions decided on 04/08/2017.

4. Let a copy of the judgment passed in the said two Writ Petitions be also made part of the record of this Writ Petition.

5. The Writ Petition stands allowed and disposed off in similar terms. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit