← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2689/2016disposed off

Maheshwar Nande v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-07-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2689 of 2016 Maheshwar Nande S/o Late Munu Nande, Aged About 73 Years Retired Headmaster, R/o Village Dumarpali ( Saraipali), Tahsil Saraipali, District Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Accountant General ( Accounts & Pension), Chhattisgarh, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. The District Education Officer, Mahasamund, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. K.K. Pandey, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. G.A.

on advance copy For Respondent No.2 :

Ms. Poornima Singh, Advocate on advance copy Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 07/07/2016 With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the petition is heard finally.

This case pertains to grievance arising on account of nongrant of retiral dues. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that the matter may be referred to the High Power Retiral Dues Committee. This Court, in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal Vs. The State of Chhattisgarh & others) and other connected matters, directed the Committee to consider the matter of retrial

dues as the disputed question of facts were involved. The Committee was constituted by the State Government, pursuant to the order dated 19-06-2006 passed in W.P.No.1961/2006 (Smt. Keja Bai Chandrakar Vs. State Government of Chhattisgarh and others), and order dated 13-3-2008 passed in M.C.C. No.105 of 2008 (State of Chhattisgarh and others Vs. Baijnath Mandal and another). Thus, this petition is squarely covered by the judgment and order dated 31st January, 2008 passed in W.P.No.4642/2004 (Baijnath Mandal (supra) as submitted by learned counsel appearing for the parties. This petition is accordingly disposed of in the same terms i.e., the office of the Advocate General is directed to send the case to the Committee, within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Thereafter, the Committee shall issue notice to the petitioner and officers concerned within a further period of 15 days. The Committee shall consider and pass order, in accordance with law, after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. The petitioner and the officers concerned may file additional documents, if necessary. The entire exercise, including payment of retiral dues, if any, to the petitioner, be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

The petitioner shall supply one complete set of the petition to the State counsel as well as counsel for the Accountant General for transferring the same to the Committee.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Rekha