High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1850/2017disposed off

Ajay Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-04-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1850 of 2017

1. Ajay Singh S/o. Shriram Karan Singh, Aged About 22 Years Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Primary School Nawdiha, Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Rajkumar, S/o. Lakhpati Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Primary School Kachhiya, Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

3. Hari Singh, S/o. Man Singh, Aged About 36 Years, Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Middle School Kachhiya, Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

4. Lanka Singh S/o. Moti Singh, Aged About 22 Years, Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Middle School Bhagbardapara (Kachhiya), Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

5. Sukhram Singh, S/o. Rupsai, Aged About 35 Years Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Primary School Padwari, Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

6. Saruju Singh, S/o. Tribhuwan Singh, Aged About 23 Years, Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Primary School Bhagbardapara (Kachhiya), Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

7. Ajmer Singh, S/o. Bhola Singh, Aged About 26 Years, Posted As Part Time Sweeper, Middle School Paschimpara Begaridand, Tehsil Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

3. The District Education Officer, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)

4. The Block Education Officer, Odgi, District Surajpur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondent For Petitioners Mr. Rahul Mishra, Advocate For Respondent/State Ms. K. Tripti Rao, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 19/4/2017

1. Heard.

2. By this petition, the petitioners, who are Part-Time Sweepers, have prayed for direction to the respondent authorities to make payment of salary/wages to the petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are regularly performing their duties since their appointment. However, the petitioners are not getting any salary for the period they have worked in the institution.

4. Taking into consideration the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, this petition at this stage is finally disposed of with a direction to the respondent-authority to pay salary to the petitioners for the period they have worked, as early as possible, preferably within a period of 03 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/- Judge (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Shyna