Rahul Kumar Vaishnav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1920 of 2017 • Rahul Kumar Vaishnav S/o Shri Nand Kumar Vaishnav, Aged About 27 Years, Presently Working as Safai Daroga, Municipal Council, Kumhari, District Durg (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Under Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner Shri Sudeep Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 24/04/2017 1.

Petitioner is aggrieved by his transfer from Municipal Council, Kumhari to Municipal Council, Khairagarh, which is the original municipality where he was initially appointed. 2.

Considering the submission made by the learned State counsel that the impugned transfer order has been passed on administrative exigency, it may not be open for this Court to assess the existence or gravity of the administrative exigency, which has necessitated the impugned order, therefore, let the

petitioner move a representation before the concerned Secretary raising his grievance in the matter within a period of 15 days from today. On such representation being filed, the concerned Secretary shall decide the representation at the earliest, preferably within a period of 6 weeks from the date of submission of representation.

3.

For a period of 8 weeks from today, the status-quo, as it exists today in relation to petitioner's posting, shall be maintained. Sd/- JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala