High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1962/2017disposed off

Derha Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-04-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1962 of 2017 • Derha Ram S/o Shri Atmaram Sahu, Aged About 45 Years Working As Suraksha Shramik (Watchman) At Plantation Area / Nandini Mines ( Ahiwara), R/o Village Ahiwara, Tahsil Dhamdha, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department of Forest, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Forest Development Corporation Limited, Head Office Lokash Plaza, Shankar Nagar Road, Shankar Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Regional General Manager, Chhattisgarh State Forest Development Corporation, B-/2, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Divisional Manager, Panabaras, Chhattisgarh Forest Development Corporation Limited, Panabaras Project Division, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri SP Sahu, Advocate For Respondents-State :

Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 25/04/2017

1. Petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents for regularization of his services in view of the fact that he claims to be appointed as daily wager in the year 1994.

2. Without commenting on the veracity or the genuineness of the petitioner's claim that he was appointed in the year 1994, the writ petition is disposed of with direction that in the event the petitioner prefers a representation before

the competent authority seeking benefit of the State Government's circular dated 05.03.2008 within a period of one month from today, the competent authority shall verify whether or not the petitioner is eligible to be considered for regularization in terms of the circular dated 05.03.2008 and thereafter the competent authority shall pass a reasoned order on its own merits, in accordance with law.

3. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall decide the matter, on its own merits, strictly in accordance with law, without treating any observation made in this order, as opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra Ashu