← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/608/2016disposed off

Prakash Chandra Sonkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-08-22Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava1 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 608 of 2016 • Prakash Chandra Sonkar S/o Late Ram Prasad Sonkar, Aged About 50 Years Presently Posted As Sub- Engineer At Project Implementation Unit Chhattisgarh Rural Development Agency, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

2. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Joint Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District- Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

3. Executive Engineer, Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Dhamtari, District- Dhamtari, (Chhattisgarh).

4. Harjeet Singh, Aged About 55 Years Sub Engineer Posted At Project Implementation Unit Chhattisgarh Rural Road Development Agency, Balod, District- Balod, (Chhattisgarh).

---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Mr. Abhishek Sharma, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, Government Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 22/08/2016 1.

This MCC has been filed by the petitioner seeking modification of earlier order and for issuance of direction to consider the case of the petitioner for cancellation / modification of the transfer order not only on the ground of ailment, but also on the ground that wife of the petitioner has been posted at Dhamtari and that he had not given any consent.

2.

These two grounds were not pressed into service at the time of argument, therefore, I am not inclined to make any modification in the earlier order.

3.

However, if these grounds are available, the petitioner may make representation for consideration by the competent authority and order passed by this Court may not be construed to limit consideration only on the ground of ailment.

4.

The MCC is accordingly disposed off.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra