Smt. Devshree Dewangan v. State Of Chhattisgarh,
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2979 of 2020
1. Smt. Devshree Dewangan W/o Shri Kamlesh Dewangan, Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Government Higher Secondary School, Jamgaon (M), Block Patan, District - Durg Chhattisgarh.
2. Smt. Shweta Pandey W/o Shri Sandeep Pandey, Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.), Government Higher Secondary School, Bhimbhori, Block - Berla, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.
2. Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Commissioner - Cum - Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh., District : Bemetara, Chhattisgarh
5. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh
6. District Education Officer, Bemetara / Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Harish Khuntia, Advocate For State :
Mr. Amrito Das, Addl. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 06/08/2020
1. The limited grievance which the petitioners have raised in this
present writ petition by virtue of order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017 have been granted benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioners prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioners were entitled from the date of their completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor the department has taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.
3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel(Supra) which has also been
4. affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents No. 2 & 3 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioners are entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order the present writ petition stands disposed off.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Vishakha