High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3025/2020disposed off

Vivek Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-08-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3025 of 2020 Vivek Pandey S/o Shri J.L.Pandey Aged About 36 Years Occupation (Service) Posted As Assistant Revenue Inspector At Nagar Panchayat Sakri, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh R/o Village Ashok Nagar, Sarkanda, P.S. Sarkanda, Tehsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Deputy Director, Urban Administration And Development, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

4. Nagar Panchayat Sakri Through Its Chief Municipal Officer, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

5. Municipal Corporation Bilaspur Through Its Commissioner, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Surfaraj Khan, Advocate For State/Respondents :

Ms. Akanksha Jain, Dy. Govt. Advocate No.1 to 3 For Respondent No.5 :

Mr. H.B.Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Mr.

Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

ORDER

07.08.2020 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was working on the post of Assistant Revenue Inspector, his promotion was considered from Assistant Revenue Inspector to Revenue Sub Inspector as he holds the requisite qualification. Learned counsel referred to Annexure P-1 and would submit that under the R.T.I. the entire documents have been obtained which would show that the petitioner's

name has been recommended for promotion to the post of Revenue Sub Inspector in the year 2018, however, the same remains to be adjudicated at the end of respondent No.3. Counsel further submits that under the circumstances, at this stage, the respondent No.3 may be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-4 which has been filed on 16.03.2020.

2. Considering the limited prayer made and perusal of the document Annexure P-1, the respondent No.3, Deputy Director, is directed to decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of this order.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Ashok