← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1667/2015disposed off

Om Sai Traders And Tent House v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2015-09-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1667 of 2015 Om Sai Traders & Tent House Through Proprietor, Deepak Sharma, S/o Shri Pawan Kumar Sharma, Age About 47 Years, R/o 52 Aadarsh Nagar, Kanker P.S. Kanker, District Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women & Child Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, District Kanker Chhattisgarh

3. District Programe, I.C.D.S., Women And Child Welfare Department, Kanker Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Dr. Shailesh Ahuja, Advocate.

For Respondent/State :

Shri Dilman Rati Minj, Dy. G.A.

Order On Board 16/09/2015 Heard.

1.

Petitioner's grievance is that though the petitioner has carried out various works of installation of tents with the respondents. Without any dispute raised by the respondent by rejecting any claim of the petitioner, arbitrarily, payments have been withheld. According to the petitioner, the claim of the petitioner has so far, remained undisputed. Therefore, there is no reason to detain the amount. 2.

Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner has not placed on record any representation to show that before filing this petition, he approached the respondents. He submits that in any case, if the petitioner prefers a representation, the respondent No.3 shall consider petitioner's claim and take proper decision.

3.

In view of above, at this stage, the petition is disposed off. Respondent 3 shall examine the grievance of the petitioner. If according to them, any amount is due and payable to the petitioner, the same shall be paid as early as possible, preferably within three months. However, if any amount is not found to be payable to the petitioner, a clear speaking order in writing shall be passed by respondent No.2 within three months. Thereafter, if the petitioner's grievance is not redressed, it will be open for him to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to him under the law. Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava J U D G E Rekha