Rohit Kumar Patkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (Cr.) No.162 of 2017 Rohit Kumar Patkar S/o Anuram Patker, Aged About 51 Years Principal High School Khairkut, Tahsil Tilda, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State Of Chhattisgarh Through : The Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2.

Superintendent Of Police, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 3.

Officer-In-Charge Of Police Chowki Kareli Badi, P. S. Magarlod, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 4.

Manharan Sahu, S/o Bhagbali Sahu, Aged About 51 Years Peon At Tahsil Office Kurud, District Dhamtari (Chhattisgarh) 5.

Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kurud, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For State : Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 15/05/2017 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that issue raised in this writ petition is covered by the decision rendered by this Court in Writ Petition (Cr) No.145 of 2016 (Titash Banik Vs. State of Chhattisgarh) decided on 23.12.2016 in which, this Court has held in paragraph-9 as under:-

"9. Here in this case, since the certified copy of the FIR has not been supplied till date, in view of the aforesaid discussion, the respondent is directed to supply the certified copy of the FIR forthwith to the petitioner as per the direction passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court". (3) Accepting the submission of learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of order dated 23.12.2016 passed in Writ Petition (Cr) No. 145 of 2016 Titash Banik (supra) and accordingly, respondents would provide certified copy of FIR to the petitioner.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-