High Court Of ChhattisgarhWP227/396/2017dismissed

Smt. Kamini Devi Awasthi v. Tahsildar Geedam

2017-06-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P.(227) No.396 of 2017

1. Smt. Kamini Devi Awasthi W/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Awasthi, Aged About 80 Years R/o Geedam, Tah - Geedam, Distt. Dantewada Chhattisgarh, Presently Residing At Maharana Pratap Nagar, Nagpur - 10 , Nagpur ( Maharashtra). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Tahsildar Geedam Tahsil Office - Geedam, Distt. Dantewada Chhattisgarh .

2. Shri Ashish Dewangan, Aged About 30 Years Tahsildar Geedam, Tahsil Office - Geedam, District - Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

3. Nayab Tahsildar Geedam, Tahsil Office Geedam, District - Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

4. Shri Shivnath Baghel, S/o Shri Mangal Ram Baghel, Aged About 42 Years R/o Village Soutnar, Post- Kokawada, Tahsil Darbha, District - Bastar Chhattisgarh , Presently - Nayab Tahsildar Geedam, Tahsil Office Geedam, District - Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

5. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Dantewada, District - Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

6. Shri Haresh Mandavi, S/o Shri C. L. Mandavi, Aged About 30 Years Permanent Resident of Dhanbeda, Tahsil - Bhanupratappur, District - North Bastar Kanker ( Chhattisgarh ) , Presently Sub Divisional Officer ( Revenue), Dantewada, Distt. Dantewada ( Chhattisgarh)

7. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Collector Dantewada, District - Dantewada Chhattisgarh .

8. Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Geedam, Tahsil Geedam, Distt. Dantewada Chhattisgarh.

9. Shri I. L. Patel, Aged About 50 Years Presently Chief Municipal Officer, Nagar Panchayat Geedam, Tahsil - Geedam , Distt - Dantewada Chhattisgarh .

---- Respondents

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate For State :

Mr. Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 19/06/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the first appeal of the petitioner has been dismissed as barred by limitation and therefore, he may be permitted to file second appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure. (2) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(3) Accordingly, the petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is at liberty to file second appeal under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure.

(4) The certified copy of the order impugned be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner, after furnishing an attested photocopy thereof.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L