← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/2/2016disposed off

Yad Ram Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-01-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.2 of 2016 Yad Ram Dhruv, S/o Shri Chinta Ram Dhruv, aged about 33 years, R/o Village Asra, Post Pond, Tahsil Chhura, District Gariyaband.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur.

2.

Collector, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband.

3.

District Education Officer, Gariyaband, District Gariyaband (CG) 4.

Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chhura, District Gariyaband.

5.

Block Education Officer, Tribal Block Chhura, District Gariyaband.

6.

Shri Sheetal Mahilang, Assistant Teacher Panchayat, Primary School Kudera Dadar, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband (CG) . --- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Jitendra Pali, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Y.S. Thakur, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 06/01/2016 (1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been transferred from Primary School, Torenga to Primary School, Kenvatijhar by the impugned transfer order dated

24.09.2015 passed by respondent No.4-Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Chhura, District Gariyaband, which is contrary to the rationalization policy. Against which, he may be permitted to make a representation before the respondent No.2 i.e. Collector, Gariyaband, to which, counsel for the State has no objection. (3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) The petitioner is permitted to make a representation before the respondent No.2-Collector, Gariyaband. If such representation is made by the petitioner within a period of 15 days from today before the said authority, the authority shall consider and decide the same on its own merit and in accordance with law preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner. (5) With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-