High Court Of ChhattisgarhCRMP/418/2013disposed off

Jagdish Prasad Agrawal v. President Chola Mandlam Dbs Finance Ltd. And ORS.

2015-12-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Cr. M.P. No. 418 of 2013 Jagdish Prasad Agrawal S/o Late Ambu Lal Agrawal Aged About 67 Years R/o Bajrang Chowk Nevra , P.S. Nevra ,distt. Raipur C.G. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. President Chola Mandlam Investment And Finance Companuy Limited ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd. )

2. Vice President M/s Chola Mandalam Investment And Finance Company Limit3ed Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd. ) Both Add Dare House , First Floor No -2 N.S.C. Bas Road Chennai ( Tamilnadu)

3. Adil Ahmad Legal Manager M/s Chola Mandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd.)

4. Nitesh Dubey , Territory Manager , M/s Chola Mandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd. )

5. Amol Bhatt, Area Manager , M/s Chola Mandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd. )

6. Ilartin Tiatus , M/s Chola Mandalam Investment And Finance Company Limited ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd.

7. A. Siram M/s Chola Mandalam Investment And Finance Company ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Lt. All Employees Res No 3 To 7 M/s Chola Incestment And Finance Company Ltd. ( Formerly Cholomandalam Dbs Finance Ltd. ) Shahid Bhagat Singh , Chowk Near Nehru Ganden , P.S. Civil Lines Raipur C.G.

8. Santosh Tiwari, Advocate Chola Mandlam DBS Finance Ltd. Respondent No.3 to 8 Address Chola Mandlam D.B.S. Finance Limited Shahid Bhagat Singh Chowk In front of Nehru Garden, Police Station Civil Lines, Raipur (C.G.) For Petitioner :- None for the petitioner.

For Respondents :- Mr. Romir S. Goyal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 09.12.2015 None for the petitioner, even when the case is called on two occasions, in the absence of any representation on behalf of the petitioner, in spite of repeated calls being made, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant Cr.M.P. for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the instant Cr.M.P. is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Santosh