Virendra Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1800 of 2015

1. Virendra Pandey S/o Badrinath Pandey, Aged About 70 Years R/o Village Nawadih, Tahsil Balrampur, Police Station Balrampur, District Balrampur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

2. Tahsildar, Balrampur, District Balrampur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioner.

: Shri H. B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Shri Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate.

For Respondent/State.

: Shri Vinod Tekam, Panel Lawyer on advance copy.

Order On Board 08/10/2015 Heard.

1.

By this petition the grievance ventilated by the petitioner is that despite application for Mutation application moved by the petitioner before the respondent no. 2, no steps have been taken nor proceedings drawn on petitioner's application. 2.

Once an application for mutation is moved by the petitioner, respondent no. 2 is required to draw appropriate proceedings and pass order one way or the other. 3.

Accordingly, the respondent no. 2 is directed to take cognizance of petitioner's application and draw appropriate proceeding under the Land Revenue Code and pass order on petitioner's application. The competent Authority shall take decision within an outer limit of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

4.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed off.

Sd/- Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Judge amita