Basant v. Shiv Prasad And ORS.

j.jlVSSinR Bar!G?i IN IHB HIGH OOURT OF JUDICATORE^)F_aiHATTJ;SG^RH A1L BILASPUR CRBiINAL REVISICN 8Q.

/2005 APPLICANT •Basant son of Shri Budhi Lal, aged 30 years, resident of village Sawarawa, Pol^ce StatioR Odgi, Tahsil Surajpur, Distriet Sarguja (Othat-tisgahr)

VERSUS

NCN-APPLICANTS

(1) Shiv Prasad, son o£ BaGhelal, aged 23 (ACCUSE0 PERSGN) years.

s~-<, ..

.

.

.

lll'efsi' tjo*M (2) Bache Lal, son of SJhui^ Sat,aged 57 years.

'' ^^f-\°"r ©?.b.ol0.;

Ful Kuwar, wife of Bache Lal, aged 50 years.

AdMne.it·>

(4) Ragh^war SOB of Bachelal, acied 25 years. R to O. R. {1}

(5) Smt. Indltuwar wife of Raghuwar aged 24 years* ,S ...w ii T (^yi- .^f€^ ^^lb^^^'

^^i^f:rs.-^ ^^y^ ^'

y ( All are resident of village Sawarawa,Poliee ^ Station Odagi, TahsU Suraj-pur, Distsic-k Sarguja (Chhattisgarh) ^- ?"~ W y'^°' r^ .g+L^ ^^^sy^ V-^w-^&^ •S.-o • 0-oly (p Ois.\~rl<--V $n'ir3ujci,>1'- ^EAO WITH SECTION 401 GRWINAL REVISIGN UNDE8_SEeTI^ GE (SWWfL PROCHDURE CX3DE 1973 E- ^s^- fe.*^

//' l^ '.xstZ'W'-'

NAFR HIGHCOURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUR CRR No. 472^f 2005 Basant -- Petitioner

Versus

Shiv Prasad And Ors.

<(.

..:(,'

-- Respondent ForAppellant None Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar IVIishra Hon'bJ&Shri Justice Anil Kumar Shukla Order On Board 18/10/2016 Since there is no representation on behalf of the appellant even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this !St|SBifBSt criminal revision for want of prosecution.

i Accordingly, the criminal revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- Sd/- Judge Judge Prashant Kumar IVIishra Anil KumarShukla Nirala