Devendra Kumar And ANR. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS.

RJ¥JF;I"'IBBSIRI

IN THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

WRIT APPEAL No.

Q.< ^'\^5 OF 2014 APPELLANT 1.

Devendra Kumar, aged about 32 years, S/o Shri Khorbahara, R/o Village & Post Mahud (B), P.S. & Tahsil - Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, Pin 491 225 ,%• ^•^•- 2.

Madan LafSarwa, aged about 41 years, S/o Shri Ram Kisan, R/o Village' Usarwara, Post Fagundah, P.S. & Tahsil Gurur, District Balod, Chhattisgarh •^^ y / «?y

VERSUS

RESPONDENTS 1.

State of Chhaftisgarh, Through:

Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Tahsil & District Chhattisgarh (earlier address D.K.S.

Bhawan, Raipur Chhattisgarh now the address is changed) 2.

Director, Directorate Health Services, Pension Bada.Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

, ^ 3.

The Collectdr, Balod, Tahsil and District Balod, Chhattisgarh 4.

Chief Medical & Health Officer, Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh 5.

Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council, through: its Registrar, Chhattisgarh Paramedical Council, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh WRIT APPEAL UNDER SECTION 2ft) OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BEANCHl ACT2006.

j nnf^^nj/^yk^ '"1

ffj^ HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR DIVISION BENCH CORAM: HON'BLE SHRI NAVIN SINHA, ACTINGCHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI INDER SINGH UBOWEJA, J.

Writ Apoeal No. 485 of 2014 Devendra Kumar & Another.

VERSUS '

State of Chhattisgarh & Others.

APPELLANTS :

RESPONDENTS :

WRITAPPEAL UNDER SECTION 2(11 OF THE CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT (APPEAL TO DIVISION BENCHt ACT 2006 Appearance: Shri Dheeraj Wankhede, Advocatefor the Appellants. Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General forthe State.,; s':;.. .:

...

s it SHit, I'lamida Siddique,AdwQcate forthe Intervenor

JUDGMENT

(16thofJanuary,2015) Per Navin Sinha. Aca. C.J.

1.

Heard counsel for the parties on the application for condonation of 447 days delay in filing the appeal. Since similar matters have already been disposed of by the Gourt.we deem it fit to condone the delay. 2.

Learned Counsel fer the parties are in agreement that the issue arising in this appeal with regard to Multipurpose Health Workers is covered by the order of the Court dated 30.10.2014 in Writ Appeal No. 530 of 2013.

3.

The date 31.06.2013 mentioned in the order dated 30.10.2014 be corrected to read as "31.08.2013".

4.

The appeal is disposed in similar terms as Writ Appeal No. 530 of 2013.

------__^- Acting ChiefJustice Inder Singh Uboweja f Judge Amit d