H.R.Chandrakar v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 1099 OF 2016 H. R. Chandrakar S/o Korbahara Chandrakar, Aged About 60 Years Presently Posted And Working As Senior Assistant, Chhattisgarh Marketing Federation, R/o Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office and Police Station Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, Raipur, Throguh The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, 880 Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, 880 Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Manager, (Establishment) Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, 880 Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents And Writ Petition (S) No. 1080 OF 2016 S. L. Dansena S/o Tilakram Dansena, Aged About 59 Years Presently Posted And Working As Senior Assistant, Chhattisgarh Marketing Federation, R/o Post Jobi, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Societies Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station
Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, Raipur, Through The Managing Director, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, 880 Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. Secretary, Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh
4. Manager (Establishment ) Chhattisgarh State Marketing Federation, 880, Civil Lines, Head Office, Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. O.P. Sahu, G.A.
For Respondents No.2 to 4 : Mr. Akash Pandey, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 13/04/2016 1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that pursuant to order Annexure P-1, recovery proceeding is being initiated against the petitioners.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the petitioners' appeal against the order dated 29/02/2016 is pending consideration before the appellate authority i.e. Chhattisgarh Rajya Sahkari Vipdan Sangh Maryadit, Raipur.
3.
Since the appeal against the petitioners is pending consideration, the appellate authority is directed to do well
and decide the appeal expeditiously.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has brought to the notice of this Court the decision rendered in Writ Petition No. 2773/2003.
5.
The appeal is pending consideration. If some proceedings of recovery are initiated against the petitioners, they are at liberty to make interim application before the appellate authority and the appellate authority would do well to decide the said application expeditiously in accordance with law.
6.
With the aforesaid observation, the writ petitions stand finally disposed of. However, the petitioners are at liberty to approach the Court, if occasion arises. 7.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
8.
No order as to cost(s).
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Tiwari