← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhCONT/666/2018disposed off

Rajesh Kumar Pathak v. Gaurav Dwivedi

2018-07-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Contempt Case (C) No. 666 of 2018

1. Rajesh Kumar Pathak, Aged about 51 years, S/o Late Shiv Kumar Pathak, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Government Higher Secondary School, Sakri, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) 2.

Ghanshaym Prasad Srivas, aged about 45 years, S/o Shri Murli Ram, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Government Higher Secondary School, Balco, District - Korba (C.G.) 3.

Ashok Kumar Nagpure, aged about 44 years, S/o Shir H.R. Nagpure, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Government Multipurpose Higher Secodary School, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4.

Satyendra Kumar Singh, aged about 48 years, S/o Shri Ramjee Singh, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Government Higher Secondary School, Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 5.

Mohammad Anwar Khan, aged about 48 years, S/o Md. Majaffar Khan, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Government Higher Secondary School, Ratanpur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 6.

Gauri Shankar Srivas, aged about 39 years, S/o Shri Manbodh Lal Srivas, Shiksha Karmi Grade III, Government Multipurpose Higher Secondary School, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ----Petitioners

Versus

1.

Gaurav Dwivedi, Secreary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, District New Raipur (C.G.) 2.

S. Prakash, Director, Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, District - Naya Raipur (C.G.) ...... Contemnors ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Palash Tiwari, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 11/07/2018 1.

Office objection is overruled.

2.

Alleging that the respondents have not complied with the orders and directions

issued by this court in W.P. (S) No. 6976/2009 dated 3.1.2018, the complainant is before this court in this contempt petition.

3.

After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, I deem it appropriate to give one more opportunity to the respondents authorities to ensure the compliance of this Court's order dated 3.1.2018 passed in W.P. (S) No. 6976/2009 4.

Counsel for the applicant may also make additional representation to the respondents authorities and, in turn, authority concerned shall ensure the compliance of this Court's order dated 3.1.2018 in its letter and spirit. 5.

With the aforesaid direction, the contempt case stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge D/-