← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/4210/2019disposed off

Punam Chand Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-06-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 4210 of 2019

1. Punam Chand Thakur S/o Bodhi Ram Thakur Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.), At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Badekanera, Block- Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh

2. Gurdeep Singh Chhabra S/o Harbans Lal Chhabra Aged About 48 Years Working As Lecturer (L.B.), At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Badekanera, Block- Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat- Kondagaon, DistrictKondagaon, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Kondagaon, District- Kondagaon, Chhattisgarh -------Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Rohit Sharma, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Shriya Mishra, Panel Lawyer.

For Respondent No. 4 :

Mr. Yogendra Pandey, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18.06.2019

1. The limited grievance of the petitioners is that they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati on completing 10 years of service which they have completed but they have not been given the same till date.

-22. Given the limited grievance raised, let the petitioners make detailed representation in this regard to Respondent No. 04 and 05 who in turn shall scrutinize the same and on due verification pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the field of Kramonnati. It is expected that an appropriate order shall be passed within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioners.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul