High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1724/2016disposed off

Ganesh Prasad Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-05-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.1724 of 2016

1. Ganesh Prasad Baghel S/o Shri Radheshyam Baghel, Aged About 37 Years Head Mastar, Govt. Primary School Korda, Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

2. Dilchandra Tiwari, S/o Shri Devi Prasad Tiwari, Aged About 47 Years Head Master, Govt. Primary School, Gindola, Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

3. Shatruhan Das Manikpuri, S/o Shri Hetram Manikpuri, Aged About 46 Years Head Mastar, Govt. Primary School Hardi, Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

4. Smt. Mamta Pandey, W/o Shri Gyanprakash Pandey, Aged About 44 Years Head Mastar, Govt. Primary School Koyda ( Solha), Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

5. Amritlal Kurre, S/o Shri Hetram Kurre, Aged About 41 Years Head Mastar, Govt. Primary School Parsadih, Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

6. Satruhanlal Banjare, S/o Shri Siriram Banjare, Aged About 41 Years Head Mastar, Govt. Primary School Paragaon, Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

7. Faguram Mandle, S/o Shri Sukhiram Mandle, Aged About 45 Years Head Mastar, Govt. Primary School, Bhalukona, Block & Tahsil Baloda Bazar, Distt. Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur, (Chhattisgarh).

2. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara, (Chhattisgarh).

3. Director, Directorate Public Instructions, Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate.

For Respondents/State : Shri Arun Sao, Dy.A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 12/05/2016

(1) Heard.

(2) Learned counsel appearing for the State/respondents would submit that the petitioners' representation shall be considered and decided by the competent authority within a period of three months from today.

(3) Prayer appears to be fair and reasonable.

(4) Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, in terms of statement made by learned counsel for the State/respondents. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-