High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3082/2020disposed off

Abhishek Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-09-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3082 of 2020

1. Abhishek Patel S/o Mohan Lal Patel Aged About 29 Years R/o Behind Family Planning Office, Sarkanda, Police Station Sarkanda, Tehsil Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Amit Kumar Tamarkar S/o Santosh Kumar Tamrakar Aged About 30 Years R/o House No. 30/113, Kevat Para, Juna Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Abhishek Kumar Singh S/o Ranbir Singh Aged About 32 Years R/o Patel Para, Near Shiv Mandir, Village Sargavan, Post Office Sakalo, District Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission Through Secretary, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Controller Of Examination Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission, Shankar Nagar Road, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (Vyapam) Through Secretary, Vyapam Bhavan, North Block, Sector -19, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. Director Directorate Of Higher Education, Indravati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioners :

Mr. Rohit Sharma, Advocate.

For State :

Mrs. Akanksha Jain, Dy. G.A.

For respondents :

Mr. Anand Mohan Tiwari, Advocate No.2 and 3.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 14-09-2020

1. Heard.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents No. 2 and 3 / Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission would submit that the relief as has been prayed by the petitioner to appear in the interview has been allowed by the Chhattisgarh State Public Service Commission and notification to this effect has been issued.

3. In view of the above, since the relief has already been granted, no further adjudication of the issue as has been raised in this writ petition is required any more.

4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Raju