← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/1787/2019dismissed

Mitul Dev v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-06-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra2 pages

WPC No. 1787 of 2019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1787 of 2019

1. Mitul Dev S/o Devlal Aged About 20 Years R/o House No. 610, Opposite Oriental Bank Indu Chowk, Bilaspur, Tahsil And DistrictBilaspur, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Health Yoga, Prakritik, Chikitsa Unanik, Sidha And Homeopathic (AYUSH) New Secretariat Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Bhartiya Ayurvedic Medical College And Hospital Pulgaon Chow Durg, Through Principal Bhartiya Ayurvedic Medical College And Hospital Pulgaon Chowk, Durg, District- Durg, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner :- Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondent-State :- Shri Anshuman Shrivastava, PL Order On Board By Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra

WPC No. 1787 of 2019 17/06/2019

1. Petitioner admitted himself in BAMS course in the year 2017 and paid some amount of fees and other charges amounting to Rs. 1,03,620/- . Petitioner left the course in the midway and is now seeking refund of the fees paid by him.

2. Bare perusal of the information of his selection as contained in Annexure P-1 would reveal that fees and other charges paid at the time of admission is not refundable. Petitioner accepted the conditions mentioned in the select letter with eyes wide open and acted upon the same by obtaining admission. He has also undergone the course for one year and later on decided not to continue the course and seek refund of the amount. Such somersault for seeking refund of the amount of fees after leaving the course midway is not permissible.

3. The Writ Petition has no substance, therefore, it deserves to be and is hereby dismissed.

Sd/- (Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge Ayushi