Rekhlal Dhrv v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 4991 of 2020 • Rekhalal Dhrv, aged 25 year, S/o Shri Ramlal Dhrv, by caste Binjhwar, R/o village Amori, P.S. Patewa & Tahsil, Civil and Revenue District Mahasamund (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through- P.S. Patewa, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For Applicant :

Shri J.A. Lohani, Advocate For Respondent :

Shri H.S. Ahluwalia, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 15/09/2020 1.

The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No.133/2020, registered at Police Station - Patewa, District Mahasamund (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 511, 467, 468, 201, 471 and 120(B) IPC. 2.

The allegation against the present applicant is that he took some documents (aadhar card, bank passbook and ration card) from the complainant on the pretext of preparing 'Shramik Card' and illegally obtained Rs.15,000/- - Rs.15,000/- from the Labour Department, Mahasamund meant for death planning. Based on this, offence has been registered. The present applicant has been taken into custody on 11.07.2020.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the applicant is ready to furnish

adequate security and also shall abide by all the directions and conditions which may be imposed upon him by the Hon'ble Court. It is next submitted that the present applicant is in custody since 11.07.2020, the charge sheet has been filed and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future. Therefore, he may be released on bail. 4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and further considering the fact that the applicant is in custody since 11.07.2020, charge sheet has been filed and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Pekde