High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2111/2017disposed off

Manharan Lal Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No.2111 of 2017

1. Manharan Lal Soni S/o Late Shri Malikram Soni Aged About 66 Years R/o Village Tikari, Tahsil & Police Station Masturi Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur ( Chhattisgarh ) Presently R/o R. K Boot House Gail, Near Nandu Garage, Telipara, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur ( Chhattisgarh )

2. Mahesh Kumar Soni S/o Late Shri Lazxman Prasad Soni Aged About 49 Years Cultivator Village Tikari, Tahsil & Police Station Masturi Civil & Revenue District Bilaspur ( Chhattisgarh ) Presently R/o City Kotwali Chowk, Gole Bazar, Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Revenue Department Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The District Collector District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

3. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Masturi District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. The Tahsildar District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. The Chief Engineer Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Office Of The Devlopment Commissioner, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

7. The Executive Engineer/Member Secretary Project Implementation Unit, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Revenue Board Compound, Mungeli Naka Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate For State : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Government Advocate Mr. P.Dayanand, Collector, Bilaspur and Mr. Krishna Kumar Katare, Chief Engineer, Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojna, Raipur are present in the Court Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board

07/09/2017 (1) Learned counsel appearing for the State would submit that the petitioner No.1 land has been taken for construction of land and in lieu of which, he will be allowed to allot the suitable or alternative land. (2) At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that they will consider the said proposal of the State, if they are offered alternative land.

(3) In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge L/-