Kedar Nath Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 1711 of 2018 Kedar Nath Sahu S/o Shri Firtu Ram Sahu, aged about 48 years, R/o Village Pawni, Police Station, Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Khadya Nagri9k Aapurti Nigam, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.)

2. The Collector, Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara (C.G.)

3. The District Distribution Officer, Chhattisgarh Rajya Vipnan Maryadit Sangh, Near Ganga Maiya Temple, Jhalmala, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District Baloda Bazar, Bhatapara (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate.

For Respondents / State :

Mr. Gary Mukhopadhyay, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 27/06/18 1.

The petitioner's appeal / representation has been decided by impugned order dated 04.05.2018 by respondent No. 2 which has been questioned in this writ petition holding that the amount due to the petitioner has already been paid to the petitioner.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the impugned order is unsustainable and bad in law and is liable to be set aside. 3.

I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the order impugned with utmost circumspection.

4.

Considering the facts, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the impugned order as the remedy of the petitioner is to approach the jurisdictional Civil Court for redressal of his grievance since the disputed

question of fact is involved in this instant case and the dispute between the parties is a contractual dispute.

5.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner to approach the jurisdictional Civil Court or any other authority in accordance with law for redressal of his grievance. No order as to cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka