High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3947/2019disposed off

Raj Kumar Pandey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-05-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3947 of 2019 Raj Kumar Pandey S/o Late Shri Y.P. Pandey Aged About 62 Years R/o Q.No. 597, Ward No.2 Bawlikuan, Bhangardeepa Marg, Raigarh (Cg)., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Forest, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Aranya Bhawan, Sector19, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Division Forest Officer Marvahi, Division Pendra, District - Bilaspur (Cg), District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vipin Tiwari, Advocate For State :

Mr. Saleem Kazi, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/05/2019

1. The limited relief, which the petitioner has sought for in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents No. 2 & 3 to ensure that the entire retiral dues payable to the petitioner is released at the earliest. In addition, there is also certain claims put forth by the petitioner while he was in service which also has not been finalized by the Department.

2. The petitioner further submits that there is also no departmental enquiry or charge-sheet pending against him, neither is he facing any sort of prosecution before any forum, by which the dues could have been retained/withheld temporarily.

-23. Given the nature of dispute that the petitioner has made, this Court is of the opinion that ends of justice would serve if the respondents No.2 & 3 are directed to consider the claim of the petitioner so far as the release of the retiral dues are concerned, including 100% of pension as compared to the interim pension that he is being presently paid.

4. Let the respondents No.2 & 3 take a decision so far as the claim of the retiral dues and other bills that the petitioner has raised and in case if it is found that the bills and the retiral dues are payable to the petitioner and that there is no embargo so far as the releasing of the same, the respondents No.2 & 3 should ensure release of the same at the earliest preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved