Atma Ram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3116 of 2020

1. Atma Ram Sahu S/o Angrahij Sahu Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Magarlod, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Prabha Sahu W/o Lakhan Kumar Sahu Aged About 48 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Soram , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

3. Smt. Purneema Wardey W/o Sanjay Wardey Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Soram, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Saraswati Dhruw W/o Bhelendra Kumar Dhruw Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Soram, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Pushplata Thakur D/o Patiram Thakur Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Soram , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

6. Smt. Sarita Tembhre W/o Shri Vasudev Tembhre Aged About 33 Years Working As Teacher And Posted At Government Middle Secondary School Kusumkasa, District Balod Chhattisgarh

7. Smt. Sarita Sharma W/o Shri Mukesh Sharma Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Soram , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

8. Suresh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Tejram Sahu Aged About 47 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Megha , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

9. Gaman Ram Nishad S/o Shri Puran Ram Nishad Aged About 43 Years Working As Teacher And Posted At Government Middle School Chandrasur, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 10.

Devnarayan Nishad S/o Shri Bishat Ram Nishad Aged About 36 Years Working As Teacher And Posted At Government Middle School Megha, Block Magarlod , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh 11.

Awadh Ram Sahu S/o Shri Puran Lal Sahu Aged About 40 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Megha, Block Magarlod , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

12.

Bhuwan Lal Sahu S/o Shri Shatrughan Lal Sahu Aged About 42 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher

Secondary School Mohadi, Block Magarlod , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 13.

Kailash Sahu S/o Shri Radheshyam Sahu Aged About 35 Years Working As Assistant Teacher And Posted At Government Primary School West Pachpedi , Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh.

14.

Kamlesh Verma S/o Shri Pyarelal Verma Aged About 45 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Rampur, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh. 15.

Harbansh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Derha Ram Sahu Aged About 46 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Rampur, Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh 16.

Prakash Ram Sahu S/o Shri Chhannu Sahu Aged About 38 Years Working As Lecturer And Posted At Government Higher Secondary School Atang District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Director Panchayat Department, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Education Officer Block Balod, District Balod Chhattisgarh.,

6. Block Education Officer Block Magarlod, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

7. Block Edcuation Officer Block Kurud , District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Ajay Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Amrito Das, Addl. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 14/08/2020

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised in this writ petition by virtue of order passed by this Court in the case of Mukesh Kumar Patel Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, WPS No. 2530/2017 decided on 26.11.2017 have been granted benefit of revised pay scale on completion of 8 years of service.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance which now remains is that the benefit is being provided to the petitioner prospectively and though the respondents have made a calculation which the petitioner is entitled from the date of his completion of 8 years of service but no effective orders have been passed nor have department has taken any steps for release of the arrears of payment. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the said amount.

3. Without entering into the merits of the case and taking into consideration the judgment of this Court in the case of Mukesh Patel(Supra) which has also been affirmed by the Division Bench and taking note of the fact that respondents have complied with the order to the extent of granting revised pay scale to the petitioner, let respondents No. 3 to 7 take an appropriate decision at the earliest so far as release of the arrears of payment which the petitioners are entitled for. Expecting a decision from the respondents within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Vishakha