← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhFAM/134/2018dismissed

Suman Agrawal v. Dhaeeraj Nayak

2020-02-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR FAM No. 134 of 2018 • Suman Agrawal W/o Dheeraj Nayak Aged About 27 Years R/o Paterapali Balsi Sarsiva Road, P. S. And Tahsil Saraypali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

Versus

• Dhaeeraj Nayak S/o Chandrabhan Nayak, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Ganiyaripali, P. S. And Tahsil Saraypali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh., ---- Respondent with FAM No. 125 of 2018 • Suman Agrawal W/o Dheeraj Nayak Aged About 27 Years Paterapali Balsi Sarsiva Road, P.S. And Tahsil Saraypali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Appellant

Versus

• Dheeraj Nayak S/o Chandrabhan Nayak Aged About 27 Years R/o Ganiyaripali P.S. And Tahsil Saraypali, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For Appellant : Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent : Shri Vikash Pradhan, Advocate D.B.: Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Hon'ble Smt. Justice Vimla Singh Kapoor Order on Board Per Manindra Mohan Shrivastava, J.

24/02/2020 Heard.

2.

Appellant and respondent both are present today. On the last date of hearing the parties were granted time to explore possibility of amicable settlement and union, if possible.

3.

We can note with great satisfaction that the appellant and respondent both have appeared in the Court today and filed the respective affidavits

stating that they have resolved all their dispute and are now residing together and leading a happy married life.

4.

Consequently, the appellant/wife has stated in her affidavit that she is not willing to press the appeal either for grant of decree of divorce or against decree of restitution of conjugal rights.

5.

Considering the aforesaid submission learned counsel for the parties and that the parties are also present in the Court and have expressed in that manner, supported by their respective affidavits filed today itself and before us, we are inclined to allow the appellant to withdraw both the appeals. 6.

Both the appeals are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Parties to bear respective costs.

Let Appellate decree be drawn in two appeals. Sd/- Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) (Vimla Singh Kapoor) Judge Judge Pawan