Ram Singh @ Bablu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 5132 of 2020 • Ram Singh @ Bablu S/o Chandrika Singh, aged about 22 years, R/o village Keshavpur Junapara, Police Station Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) ---- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through : Station House OfÏcer, Police of Police Station - Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) ---- Respondent For Applicant :

Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate For Respondent/State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Smt Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 17/09/2020 1.

The applicant has preferred this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No.31/2019 registered at Police Station - Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 376 and 450 IPC.

2.

The allegation against the applicant is that he committed forcible sexual intercourse with the prosecutrix on the pretext of marriage as a result of which she became pregnant and delivered a child, and thereafter, the applicant refused to marry with her. Based on this, offence has been registered. The present applicant has been taken into custody on 02.05.2019.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the case. He further submits that the prosecutrix is major lady aged 24 year and she was the consenting party to the act of the applicant. He also submits that the report has been lodged against the applicant after she delivered the child. He also submits that the applicant is in custody since 02.05.2019,

charge sheet has been filed and there is no likelihood of his case being decided in near future. Therefore, he may be released on bail.

4.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application.

5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

6.

Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case, quality of evidence and further considering the fact that the prosecutrix is major aged 24 year, the applicant is in custody since 02.05.2019, charge sheet has been filed and the trial is likely to take some time, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 8.

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one solvent surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

Certified copy, as per rules.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge pekde