Smt. Ramshilla Bai Sandilya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3176 of 2020

1. Smt. Ramshilla Bai Sandilya W/o Shri Chhotelal Sandilya Aged About 45 Years Occupation, Class 4/ Peon Karmi Shash. Post Matric Kanya Chatrawas Janjgir R/o Village Janjgir Thana Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

2. Mansi Bai D/o Shri Chhotelal Aged About 20 Years Occupation, Class 4/ Peon Karmi Shash. Pri Matric Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatrawas Birra R/o Village Birra Thana Birra District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Jaanki Kurre D/o Shri Ramsingh Kurre, Aged About 37 Years Occupation, Class 4/ Peon Karmi Shash. Pri Matric Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatrawas Birra R/o Village Birra Thana Birra District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

4. Smt. Gangotri Kawar W/o Shri Bhajanlal Kawar Aged About 28 Years Occupation, Class 4/ Peon Karmi Shash. Post Matric Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatrawas Janjgir R/o Shantinagar Janjgir Thana Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

5. Smt. Godawari Suryavanshi W/o Shri Samelal Suryavanshi Aged About 20 Years Occupation, Class 4/ Rasoiya Karmi Shash. Post Matric Anusuchit Jati Kanya Chatrawas Janjgir R/o Janjgir Thana Janjgir District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikash Vibhag, Mantralay Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner, Aadim Jati And Anusuchit Jati Vikash Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Assistant Commissioner, Aadiwashi Vikash Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

4. Collector, Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Abdul Wahab Khan, Advocate For Respondents/State :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. GA

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 17/08/20

1. The Petitioners through the present Writ Petition seek for a direction to the Respondents to take decision on the claim of the Petitioners for placing their services as contingency paid employees.

2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that present Petitioners are working with the Respondents since 1993, 2016, 2014 and 2016 respectively. The Petitioners meanwhile had moved an application before the Respondents for considering their claim for placing them as contingency paid employee taking into consideration the past services of the Petitioners rendered with the Respondents.

3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners have already made detailed representation before the authorities concerned which are pending consideration and have till now not been decided by the Respondents Authorities. Therefore, a limited direction may be issued to Respondent No.3 to take appropriate decision on the claim of the Petitioners to consider their matter for being placed as contingency paid employee.

4. Learned State Counsel has no objection if the Petition is disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 for considering the representation of the Petitioners.

5. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off with a direction to Respondent No.3 to consider the representation made by the Petitioners and take decision on the claim of the Petitioners in accordance

with the rules governing the field.

6. It is expected that Respondent No.3 shall take a decision on the claim of the Petitioners as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 90 days from today.

7. With the aforesaid observation the present Writ Petition stands disposed off.

SD/-Sd/-/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu