P.R.Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3552 of 2017 (Arising out of judgment/order dated ......... in Case No. ...... of the learned......) P.R.Yadav S/o Late Shri K R Yadav Aged About 59 Years Occupation Service, Presently Working As Assistant Teacher, Basic Training Institute, Bilaspur, R/o C- 28, Agyey Nagar, Bilaspu, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Department Of Finance & Planning, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Chhattisgarh, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office & Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

5. District Education Officer Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

6. Principal, Government Basic Training Institute, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Malay Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 09/08/17 Heard.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he has made a representation to the respondent authorities for grant of time bound pay scale from the date of his actual entitlement but that has not been considered and decided by the competent authorities. 2.

Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to make a fresh

representation to the respondent authorities/State Government claiming benefit of time bound pay scale from the date of his actual entitlement. The State Government shall consider and decide the petitioner's application on its own merit, expeditiously preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

3.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Priyanka