High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/1641/2016disposed off

Ram Naresh Burman v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2016-07-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 1641 of 2016

1. Ram Naresh Burman S/o Shri Dhaniram Burman, Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Dhangaon, Post Rasonta, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattigarh

2. Shriram Khare, S/o Jodhiya Ram Khare, Aged About 44 Years R/o Village Makeri, Post Rasonta, District Pamgarh, Tahsil Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Bhubneshwar Prasad Ratre, S/o Shri Bhakhlaram Ratre, Aged About 46 Years R/o Village Dudga, Post Bhadra, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

4. Balram Dheevar, S/o Shri Babulal, Dheevar, Aged About 42 Years R/o Donga Kohrod, Tahsil Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Thorugh Secretary, Department of Panchayat D.K.S. Bhawan Mantralaya, Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Collector, (Mission Director), District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :

Dr. Shailesh Ahuja, Advocate For State/Respondents :

Mr. D.R. Minj, Dy. GA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 07/07/2016 1.

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioners' claim for similar treatment was rejected by the Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pamgarh stating that there is no order in favour of the petitioners and therefore, petitioners could not claim the same benefit, which has been granted to the petitioner in W.P.(S) No. 5391/2008.

Learned counsel for the petitioner placed on record a copy of order dated 30.09.2008 passed in W.P.(S) No. 5391/2008 in which, this

Court has disposed of the petition with liberty to make a representation along with copy of the order before the competent authority for appointment as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III. 3.

Learned State counsel submits that if any such representation is made, the same shall be decided in accordance with law. 4.

In view of the above submission, the petition stands disposed of on similar terms as the order passed in W.P.(S) No. 5391/2008. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra