Lavan Kumar Rawte v. The State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4101 of 2019
1. Lavan Kumar Rawte S/o Mr. Janak Lal Rawte Aged About 41 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Lb) Govt. Police Station Khalari No. 1, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh
2. Ajeet Shiv Tiwari S/o Mr. Shiv Kumar Tiwari Aged About 38 Years By Occupation Assistant Teahcer (Lb) Govt. H.S.S. Khalari Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh
3. Nakul Ram Alendra S/o Mr. Jhadi Ram Alendra Aged About 31 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Lb) Govt. Police Station Dhobni B, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh
4. Narsingh Yadav S/o Mr. Biram Yadav Aged About 38 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Lb) Govt. Police Station Singanwahi, No. 1, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh
5. Mrs. Kimlata Yadav W/o Mr. Nitin Yadav Aged About 38 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Lb) Govt. Police Station Surdongar, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh
6. Mrs. Saraswati W/o Mr. Rajkumar Sahu Aged About 35 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (L.B.) Govt. H.S.S. Kumudkatta, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh
7. Chatur Ram Vasu S/o Mr. Anand Ram Aged About 46 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (Lb) Govt. H.S.S. Kumudkatta, Block Dondi, District Balod Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners
Versus
1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. District Education Officer District Balod Chhattisgarh
-24. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat District Balod Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioners :
Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate.
For Respondents :
Mr. Rahul Mishra, Dy. G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/06/2019
1. Challenge in this petition is that though the petitioners were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and have subsequently been absorbed to the Education Department, they have by now completed 10 years of service and therefore they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati as per rules governing the field, however, the respondents till date have not granted the said benefit to the petitioners.
2. Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the petitioners make a suitable representation to the respondents No. 3 and 4 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Order and the respondents No. 3 and 4, in turn, shall take a decision on the granting of Kramonnati to the petitioners within a further period of 90 days.
3. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul