← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2249/2017dismissed

Nikhil Purohit v. Union Of India

2017-08-24Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sharad Kumar Gupta2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 2249 of 2017 • Nikhil Purohit S/o Dr. Rupal Purohit, Aged About 19 Years R/o H I G 15, Housing Board Colony, Tatibandh, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Health And Family Welfare, Moti Lal Nehru Marg, New Delhi

2. Central Board Of Secondary Education, Through Its Secretary, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092

3. The Deputy Secretary (Exam) National Eligibilty Cum Entrance Test Unit, Central Board Of Secondary Education, Shiksha Kendra, 2, Community Centre, Preet Vihar, Delhi-110092

4. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Health & Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Mandir Hasod, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Department Of Medical Education, State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Director, Old Nurses Hostel, D.K.S. Bhawan Campus, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Hari Agrawal, Advocate For UOI :

Mr. N.K. Vyas, Assistant Solicitor General For State :

Mr. U.N.S. Deo, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Sharad Kumar Gupta, Judge Order On Board Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice 24.08.2017

1. The petitioner appeared for NEET-UG-2017 Examination. He pleads

that for two questions, the C.B.S.E. has prescribed erroneous Answer Key. Though, we had required the learned counsel for the C.B.S.E. to obtain instructions, the learned Assistant Solicitor General has placed before us a copy of the Record of Proceeding dated 12.06.2017 in S.L.P.(C) No. 17447 of 2017. Whatever be the ultimate decision in relation to the two questions about which disputes are raised by the petitioner, that will have an impact on All India basis if we were to answer that issue against the stand of the C.B.S.E. regarding the correct Key to the two questions. Under such circumstances, we would go by the terms contained in the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court that High Courts are not to entertain Writ Petitions in the matter.

2. We accordingly dismiss this Writ Petition without prejudice to the contentions.

3. Certified copy today.

Sd/- Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (Sharad Kumar Gupta) Chief Justice Judge Kishore