Smt. Sunita Sidar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2164 of 2016 • Smt. Sunita Sidar W/o Shri Churamani Sidar, Aged About 32 Years Working as Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) at Govt. Primary School, Bunga, Tahsil Pusour, District Raigarh R/o Village & Post Bunga, Tah. Pusour, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattsigarh)

4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (Chhattisgarh)

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Pusour, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance :

For the petitioner :

Shri R.S. Patel, Advocate For the Respondents/State :

Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A. on advance copy.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 16/06/2016 Heard.

2.

The petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 18-04-2016 on several grounds. One of the grounds that has been raised in the petition is that the order violates the policy of keeping husband and wife together as far as possible. 3.

The petitioner preferred this petition without filing her representation probably for the reason that the order is sought to be challenged on the ground of jurisdiction as well.

4.

However, the ground that the broad policy of keeping the husband and wife as far as possible requires consideration. It is expedient at this stage to dispose of the

petition with a direction to the petitioner to represent her case within 10 days from today before the competent authority who passed the transfer order and the same shall be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Meanwhile, for a period of three weeks, the impugned transfer order shall not be given effect to in relation to the petitioner. 5.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) JUDGE Kvr