Nand Lal Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2627 of 2016 • Nand Lal Soni S/o Shri Khuburam Soni, Aged About 41 Years Working As Assistant Teacher Panchayat At Govt. Primary School Dumarpali East Tahsil And District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Thorugh Secretary Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya Mahandi Bhawan, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
3. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Kabirdham District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh
5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Raigarh, Disrict Raigarh Chhattigarh ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :
Mr. R.S. Patel, Advocate For State Respondents :
Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. AG --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 05/07/2016 Heard.
1.
The petitioner has challenged the transfer order dated 18-04-2016 on several grounds. One of the grounds that has been raised in the petition is that the order violates the policy of keeping husband and wife together as far as possible.
2.
The petitioner preferred this petition without filing his representation probably for the reason that the order is sought to be challenged on the ground of jurisdiction as well. 3.
However, the ground that the broad policy of keeping the husband and wife as far as possible requires consideration. It is expedient
at this stage to dispose of the petition with a direction to the petitioner to represent his case within 10 days from today before the competent authority who passed the transfer order and the same shall be decided within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. Meanwhile, for a period of three weeks, the impugned transfer order shall not be given effect to in relation to the petitioner.
4.
With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra