← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/3184/2020dismissed

Uttra Kumar Ekka v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-08-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3184 of 2020 • Uttra Kumar Ekka S/o Sunau Ekka Aged About 32 Years R/o Jhaaraama, Post Birsingha , Police Station And Tehsil Lailunga, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh The Secretary , Tribal Welfare Development Department Mantralaya , Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur , District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat , Lailunga , District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Sumit Singh Rathore, Advocate For State :

Mr. Amrito Das, AAG.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 17-08-2020

1. Heard.

2. The present petition has been filed to quash the advertisement dated 3-7-2020 (Annexure P/1) issued by the respondent No.2. It is contended that the advertisement has been made by Janpat Panchayat, Jhaarama on 3-7-2020 wherein Rozgar Saahayak ought to have been appointed. It is also contended

that certain posts at village Gram Panchayat Jhzaarama have been reserved for Scheduled Castes (Disabled) candidates, but in the Gram Panchayat, village Jhaarma, there are six persons of one family where four persons are adults and two are children who belong to Scheduled Castes and that too they are not disabled persons, therefore, the post reserved for Scheduled Castes disabled may be converted into other reserved candidates for Scheduled Tribes.

3. Prima facie, the grievance of the petitioner appears to be without any logic & basic substance and support. The grievance raised by the petitioner cannot be considered before the selection process is completed. At this stage, even the selection process is yet to start, it cannot be held that a particular person for a particular post would not be available in the village, therefore, the seat be converted. The submission of the petitioner is completely on the surmises and it cannot be appreciated at this stage.

4. Accordingly, the petition being devoid of merit is liable to be and is hereby dismissed at motion stage itself. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Raju