Kishun Ram Meshram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 2913 of 2016 Kishun Ram Meshram S/o Late Shri Chandan Meshram, Aged About 64 Years R/o Chandan Villa, Kosha Nagar, Ward No. 2, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)

3. Municipal Corporation, Bhilai, Thorugh Commissioner, Municipal Corporaiton Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Tarkeshwar Nande, Advocate For State :

Shri R.K. Gupta, Dy.A.G.

For Municipal Corporation :

Shri H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate with Smt. Meera Jaiswal, Advocate S.B.:

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 04/08/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's claim that regular services rendered by the petitioner as regular employee of erstwhile Special Area Development Authority (for short "SADA"), Bhilai, where he was initially appointed are liable to be counted for the purposes of pensionable services. He submits that identical issue has been decided by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in batch of petitions WP(S) No.4459 of 2014 and other cases.

-22.

Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute the petitioner's claim of being identically placed as the petitioner, in whose favour, orders were passed in the case referred to above.

3.

In view of the above, this petition is also liable to be allowed and is allowed. Let the same benefit accrue to the petitioner as directed by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in similar petition.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Praveen