← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCC/405/2021allowed

Sushil Kumar Dewangan v. Board Of Secondary Education

2021-08-16Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCC No. 405 of 2021 • Sushil Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri Madan Lal Dewangan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Lalkhadan, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Board of Secondary Education Through The Secretary, M.P. Board of Secondary Education Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

2. Board of Secondary Education Through The Regional OfÏcer, C.G. Board of Secondary Education, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. The Secretary, Department of Education Government of Madhya Pradesh, Bhopal.

4. The Principal, Modern Higher Secondary School, Nehru Nagar Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.

5. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Bilaspur. ---- Respondents For Applicant :

Mr. Uttam Pandey, Advocate.

For respondents :

Mr. Sameer Sharma, Dy. G.A.

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order On Board 16/08/2021 Proceeding through video conferencing.

2.

The applicant has filed present MCC for correction of para 6 of order dated 09.07.2021 passed in F.A.No.78/2007 indicating that his name for respondent No.1-Sushil Kumar Dewangan in F.A.No.78/2007 and applicant herein has not been mentioned. According to him, the applicant herein has engaged him and his associates advocates Mr. R.R. Dwivedi and Ms. Rani Pathak as his counsel to prosecute the case on his behalf and handed over vakalatnama which came to be filed on 15.06.2010.

3.

Mr. Uttam Pandey, learned counsel submits that earlier he regularly appeared before this Court as and when the case was listed for hearing but his name could not be mentioned in the final order for respondent No.1 in F.A.No.78/2007. 4.

This Court has gone through the earlier order sheets as also order dated 09.07.2021 passed in F.A. No.78/2007. Considering the fact that the present MCC is supported by afÏdavit of applicant herein, the MCC is allowed and para 6 of the order dated 09.07.2021 passed in F.A. No.78/2007 is modified and be read as under :- "6.

On previous dates, Mr. Uttam Pandey, counsel appeared for respondent No.1."

5.

Accordingly, the present MCC is allowed to the extent indicated herein above.

Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) JUDGE PKD