Shri Mahabir Shiksha Prasar Samiti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 3076 OF 2016 Shri Mahabir Shiksha Prasar Samiti, a registered Society, having its registered office at Gudhiyari, Raipur, Thana and Post Gudhiyari, Dist. Raipur, through its Secretary, Shri Raj Kamal Boob, S/o late Shri Bridhi Chand Boob, 62 years, Gudhiyari, Thana and Post Gudhiyari, Dist. Raipur, (C.G.) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1.

State of Chhattisgarh through Department of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) 2.

Directorate of Public Instructions, through the Commissioner, Vivekanand Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) 3.

Tehsildar, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.) 4.

Shri K. C. Pandey, son of late Shri Keshav Pandey, R/o 50/359, Bandhwapara, Purani Basti, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5.

Shri R. K. Tiwari, R/o Tilak Nagar, Gudhiyari, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6.

Shri Sukhiram Yadav, S/o Late Shri Kanhaiyalal Yadav, R/o Ganga Nagar, Bhanpuri, Near Durga Mandir, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7.

Smt. B. Leela Patnaik, W/o Shri B. Ramesh, R/o D/184, Sector- 1, Devendra Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Amrito Das, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Dilmanrati Minj, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order on Board 21/07/2016 1.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner raising grievance that respondent-State has not taken any decision on petitioner's claim despite a categoric direction given by this Court on 22/04/2015 in WPS No. 6558 of

2014. It is the case of the petitioner that though, this Court directed for consideration of petitioner's claim within three months, till date no decision has been taken and in the meantime, in view of the direction issued by this Court in the petition filed by retired teacher claiming gratuity, coercive step has been initiated. If direction issued by this Court for decision of the petitioner's claim has not been complied with, the remedy of the petitioner lies in taking appropriate proceedings on such allegation of disobedience. 2.

With the aforesaid observation, the petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Tiwari