Basant Kumar Khare v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4782 of 2019

1. Basant Kumar Khare S/o Tuka Ram Khare Aged About 34 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. P.S. Dhotim Tola, Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

2. Mrs. Pratima Sahu W/o Mr. Nakul Ram Sahu Aged About 42 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. P.S. Themakhurd Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Mrs. Mona Rawal W/o Mr. Khemchand Rawat Aged About 31 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. P.S. Bangaon Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

4. Mrs. Bheekhee Khare W/o Mr. Shobhit Ram Khare Aged About 31 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. P.S. Bhainsobod Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

5. Utkal Kumar Sahu S/o Mr. Puranik Ram Sahu Aged About 31 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. P.S. Khalari No.2 Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh

6. Dhani Ram Barle S/o Mr. Ratnu Lal Aged About 33 Years By Occupation Assistant Teacher (LB) Govt. P.S. Khalari No.2 Block Dondi, District- Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer District- Balod, Chhattisgah

4. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat District- Balod, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents

-2For Petitioners :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate.

For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 01/07/2019

1. Ignoring the default pointed out by the Registry, with the consent of the parties, the matter is heard finally at motion stage and disposed off.

2. Challenge in this Petition is that though the petitioners were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and have subsequently been absorbed to the Education Department, they have by now completed 10 years of service and therefore they are entitled for the benefit of Kramonnati as per rules governing the field, however, the respondents till date have not granted the said benefit to the petitioners.

3.

Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the petitioners made a suitable representation to the Respondent No. 04 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Order and the Respondent No. 04, in turn, shall take a decision on the granting of Kramonnati to the petitioners within a further period of 90 days.

4.

The Writ Petition, accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul