Smt. Sunita Nagvanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3185 of 2016 • Smt. Sunita Nagvanshi W/o Shri Mahtma Nagvansi, Aged About 36 Years Teacher ( Panchayat), At Middle School Keratonga, R/o Village & Post Rokel, Tahsil & P S Chhindgarh, District Sukma (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat & Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Raipur, (Chhattisgarh)
2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Sukma, District Sukma, (Chhattisgarh)
3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kanker, District Kanker, (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner :
Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Advocate For State :
Mr. S.P. Kale, Dy. Advocate General --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 27/07/2016 Heard.
1.
The petitioner has filed this petition seeking a direction to respondents to post the petitioner to a place nearby the place of posting of her husband who is posted as Teacher (Panchayat) at Antagarh, District - Kanker.
2.
It is found that the petitioner is presently posted as Teacher (Panchayat) Middle School, Keratonga, Zila Panchayat Sukma, District - Sukma which is stated to be far away from the place of posting of her husband.
3.
The Government has come out with a policy of postings and transfers in which, there is a provision for consideration of posting
of husband and wife together as far as possible, subject to administrative exigency.
4.
In view of above, it is observed that as and when occasion arises for shifting the petitioner from the present place of posting, the department shall also keep in mind the policy of the State Government of keeping the husband and wife together as far as possible, subject to administrative exigency. The respondents shall decide petitioner's representation as early as possible. 5.
With the aforesaid observation, the petition is finally disposed off. Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge Chandra