Shyam Singh Koreti v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3183 of 2020 • Shyam Singh Koreti S/o Shri Dhanaji Ram Koreti Aged About 35 Years Occupation Panchayat Secretary (Suspended) , Janpad Panchayat Koiylibeda, Tahsil Pakhanjur District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh, R/o Ward No. 05, Village Koiylibeda Bazar Para Police Station Koiylibeda District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh., ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department , Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya , Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director Panchayat And Rural Development Department , Indrawati Bhawan Nawa Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

4. The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Kanker District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh

5. The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Koiylibeda District Uttar Bastar Kanker Chhattisgarh., District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For petitioner :

Mr. Jitendra Nath Nande, Advocate.

For State ;

Mr. Amrito Das, AAG.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 17-08-2020 Heard.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner was suspended by order dated 7-7-2020 (Annexure

P/1). It is contended that the suspension order was passed as the petitioner was absent on 24-6-2020 & 25-6-202 for the reason, certain incident took place in the relation of the petitioner and someone died due to drowning in the river, therefore, the petitioner may be given liberty to make a representation before respondent No.4 who may consider and decide the same, in accordance withn law, after verification of the facts.

2. Learned State counsel submits that the order is appealable.

3. Considering the reason assigned by the petitioner that some mishap accident occurred in the house of the petitioner, therefore, without making any observation on the merits of the case, the petitioner is given liberty to make a representation before respondent No.4 within a period of two weeks and on such representation being filed, respondent No.4 shall consider and decide the same, within further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

4. With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) J U D G E Raju