Baijnath Prasad Shrivastava v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 3430 of 2016 Baijnath Prasad Shrivastava S/o Shri Bhudwant Lal, Aged About 62 Years R/o Malviya Nagar, West Chirmiri, District Korea (Chhattisgarh). ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Mahanadi Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, P. S. Rakhi, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. The Director, Department Of Urban Administration And Development, Indrawati Bhavan, Capital Complex, New Raipur, P. S. Rakhi, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

3. Municipal Corporation, Chirmiri, Through Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Chirmiri District Korea (Chhattisgarh) ---- Respondents Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, counsel for the petitioner/s. Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, G.A. for the State.

Mr. Sudeep Agrawal, counsel for respondent No.3. Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava Order On Board 05/08/2016 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner's claim that regular services rendered by the petitioner as regular employee of erstwhile Special Area Development Authority (for short "SADA") Chirmiri, where he was initially appointed, are liable to be counted for the purposes of pensionable services. He submits that identical issue has been decided by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in batch of petitions WP(S) No.4459 of 2014 and other cases. 2.

Learned counsel for the respondents do not dispute that the petitioner's claim of being identically placed as the petitioner, in whose favour, orders were passed in the case referred to above.

3.

In view of the above, this petition is also liable to be allowed and is allowed. Let the same benefit accrue to the petitioner as directed by this Court vide order dated 08.02.2016 in similar petition.

Sd/- (Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) J U D G E Rekha