← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4/2014dismissed

Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Karmchari Sangh Durg Through Its President Shri Rajendra Sharma And ANR v. State Of Chhattisgarh And ORS

2019-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet WPC No. 4 of 2014 Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Karmchari Sangh, Durg, Through Its:-

1. President Shri Rajendra Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, S/o Shri Daduram Sharma, R/o Subhash Nagar, Near Talwar Building, Ekta Kunj, Ward No. 41, Durg, Thana And Post Kasardih, Tahsil Durg, Distt. Durg, C.G. Pin 491001 2.

Secretary Shri Hiryesh Sharma, Aged About 40 Years, S/o Shri Baldev Prasad Sharma, R/o B-366, Smriti Nagar, Bhilai, Thana And Post Smriti Nagar, Tahsil Bhilai, Distt. Durg, C.G. Pin 491001 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Tahsil Post And Thana Naya Raipur, C.G. 492002

2. Registrar, Cooperative Societies C.G., 2nd Floor Indrawati Bhawan Naya Raipur, Tehsil Post And Thana Naya Raipur, C.G. 492002

3. Jila Sahkari Kendriya Bank, Durg Through The Chief Executive Officer, Jila Sahkari Bank, Durg, G.E. Road Thana City Kotwali Post Durg, Distt. Durg C.G. 491001

4. Reserve Bank Of India, Through The Principal Chief General Manager, Having Its Central Office At Central Office Building Shahid Bhagat Singh Road, Post And Thana Fort, Mumbai 400001

5. Natioal Bank For Agriculture And Rural Development Bank (NABARD), Through The Managing Director, Having Its Head Office At Bandra Kurla Complex Post And Thana Bandra (East) Mumbai 400051 Maharashtra

6. C.G. Rajya Sahkari Krishi Avam Gramin Vikas Bank, Raipur 1st Floor, B-Block RDA Building, Sharda Chowk Thana Mahoudapara Tahsil And Post Raipur C.G. 492001

7. Zila Sahkari Krishi Avam Gramin Vikas Bank, Durg G.E. Road Thana City Kotwali Post Durg, Distt. Durg C.G. 491001 ---- Respondents 04/09/2019 None for the petitioner.

Shri Sudhir Sahu, P.L. for the State.

Even in the second call, none appears nor any representation is made on behalf of the petitioner, therefore, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge Jyoti